Apr 15 2011
Participatory Mapping, CrisisMapping and Community Resilience
Lela and I had the distinct honor in giving the Woelfl Seminar on Public Policy at John Carroll University. First, we wanted to deeply thank the Political Science Department at JCU for affording us the opportunity and especially to Dr. Jen Ziemke, Assistant Professor in Political Science and Co-Founder of the International Network of Crisis Mappers. It was truly a pleasure and an honor both to be asked to speak in such a prestegious forum and to have the opportunity to speak with such engaged and thoughtful faculty and students. It was a breath of fresh air, to say the least.
I’d like to take a minute here to highlight a few points from our talk that resonated with attendees and that might be of interest to the participatory mapping, crowd sourcing and crisismapping communities. With the advent of so many new technologies and pathways to gather real-time, crowdsourced data (Twitter, SMS, web forms, ect.), and tools constructed to harness these real-time data streams (Ushahidi most notably), the focus in the among crisismappers tends to be the rapid-onset, acute crisis. And we’ve had a number of these rapid-onset, acute crises to deal with in the last several years (just think about the number of crises since the beginning of 2011 in which crisismapping has been valuable - Egypt, Libya, Japan, Christchurch, among others) many of which have driven the development of these tools.
There’s nothing inherently wrong with this focus on the acute crisis, and perhaps these tools when applied correctly can have the greatest impact under these conditions. However, we’re concerned that crisismapping is taking participatory mapping as a whole down the road of focusing exclusively on the acute crisis. Clearly this is not intentional among crisismappers – these are incredibly hard working people who in large measure are volunteering their considerable expertise to help save lives. We wanted to raise the issue not to curtail the fantastic work on acute crises, but mainly to point out that it’s critical to mitigate the slow-onset, chronic crises if our ultimate goal is to improve community resiliency such that when acute crises happen, communities have the capacity to respond to them with limited outside intervention.
Much of NiJeL’s work focuses on the mitigating the slow-onset, chronic crisis, and our talk also focused on 1) how some of the lowest tech methods can be you most valuable tool when mapping chronic issues (health, poverty, food security and safety, climate change, sexual harassment, urban neglect…), and 2) how technology is often the easiest part of mapping chronic issues. The hard part is gathering people to your issue and building a cohesive, collective movement to both document where and what positive and negative events are happening and, ultimately, to lessen or remove a social, economic or environmental ill. Participatory mapping provides the tools (both low and high tech) to capture, describe and analyze any of these chronic issues, but we emphasize the need for community building before one deploys whatever tool they’re considering in their work.
Again, many thanks again to Dr. Ziemke and JCU for this opportunity!

